Dinner
for Schmucks
Review - Matt Mungle
There
is a saying in poker that if you can't spot
the sucker in the first half hour at the
table, then you ARE the sucker. In the new
comedy Dinner for Schmucks from director
Jay Roach (Meet the Parents and Austin Powers
films), I have to wonder if the sucker in
all of this are the movie goers. We have
all been awaiting this comedy for months
thanks to a brilliantly funny trailer. But
my concern is that when it is all said and
done we are the ones being laughed at.
The story is about an up and coming executive
named Tim (Paul Rudd) who wants to impress
his boss (Bruce Greenwood). To do so he
must attend a company dinner party in which
each member of the firm invites the biggest
idiot they know. They call it a dinner for
winners but little do the guests know but
what they are winning is the title of biggest
idiot. Tim reluctantly joins in by inviting
his new friend Barry (Steve Carell) who
has a very strange hobby indeed. Sadly Tim
get more than he bargained for as Barry
all but ruins Tim’s life; although
he really means well.
The main issue is that the draw of the film,
the dinner, doesn’t happen until way
over an hour into the movie. It is more
about this good hearted nerd and the havoc
he wreaks on Tim. It felt a lot like the
early 90’s Bill Murray comedy What
About Bob? It is less about this dinner
and more about this annoying guy that Tim
can’t seem to get rid of. Don’t
get me wrong, the movie is funny and Carell
is in top form but it isn’t the movie
I went to see. Or thought I was going to
see. Once they finally make it to the dinner
party it is non stop laughs and bust a gut
moments. But it seemed too little too late.
If anything it is more a dysfunctional romantic
comedy concerning Tim and his girlfriend
Julie (Stephanie Szostak).
There is a message here about people and
their feelings. How we sometimes instantly
judge and laugh at others because they are
quirky in some way. But once we get to know
them we find that they have passions, loves
and hurts like the rest of us. The film
sort of shows that point but definitely
doesn’t make a lot of effort to drive
it home. Dinner for Schmucks is rated PG-13
for sequences of crude and sexual content,
some partial nudity and language. Though
good natured most of the time there are
several scenes that parents will find awkward
to watch with their High Schooler’s.
Even some couples might find it too sophomoric
for a strong date night film. All in all
I found it disappointing and though the
laughs were there and at times strong it
still didn’t have the substance I
would have hoped for. I can only give it
2.75 out of 5 place settings. It might have
been funnier had I been told up front what
to expect. Sucker.
|